John C. Wright, My Paternal 5th Great Grandfather
DAR Ancestor #A130889
52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks
Prompt: A Record I Read Differently Now
Background
John C. Wright was born 4 January 1717 in Chester County, Pennsylvania, and died before 8 June 1790 in Newberry County, Ninety-Six District, South Carolina. His wife was Rachel Wells. The family were Quakers. He is perhaps best known as the father of Charity Wright Cook, a traveling Quaker minister. Much has been written about her life in the book Charity Cook: A Liberated Woman by Algie I. Newman.
He was also the father of my 4th great-grandmother, Elizabeth Wright McCool, and fifteen other children.
Finding Revolutionary War Ancestors - Make a List of Possibilities
Six years ago, when I began searching for a Revolutionary War ancestor whose line I could prove in order to join the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR), I made a list of my ancestors who were of the right age to possibly be a Revolutionary War Patriot. I included John C. Wright even though Quakers are known for their commitment to nonviolence and rejection of war. Think of Grace Kelly in High Noon, urging Gary Cooper not to pick up his guns again to confront the outlaws headed toward town.
Look up ancestors on DAR GRS and Fold3
So when I looked him up in the DAR Genealogical Research System (GRS), I was surprised to find a profile for him. I knew it was the correct John Wright because the record showed he was married to Rachel Wells and that the lines of many of his children had already been documented through DAR membership applications.
His descendants are eligible to join DAR based on his “Patriotic Service,” specifically that he “furnished supplies.” I noted that on my research spreadsheet.
Patriot support in the South Carolina backcountry often came in the form of food, forage, and livestock supplied to Continental and militia forces.
I also had a short biographical note about John Wright from his Find A Grave memorial, which stated that:
“When the Revolution came, John apparently was fed up with being a pacifist. Even though he was then in his fifties, he immediately joined the celebrated American fighting group called Col. Thompson’s Rangers as Pvt. John Wright and was at the famous Battle of Cowpens.”
That didn’t sound quite right for a Quaker, but I made a note of it.
This year, when I decided to write about my Revolutionary War patriots for my blog, I revisited the information I had on John Wright. I thought it could make an interesting story if a Quaker had indeed become a soldier.
Check Sources
I found a list—though admittedly not complete—of soldiers present at the Battle of Cowpens. John Wright was not on the list.
I went back to the DAR profile and noted that the source for his service was:
SC ARCH, ACCTS AUD #8802, Roll #163
ChatGPT informed me this referred to the South Carolina Archives, Accounts Audited records, which are available online. I located the file—sixteen pages of handwritten documents.
I fed each page into ChatGPT for transcription, and what I found was far more interesting than the simple phrase “furnished supplies.”
Supplies to Greene’s Army
The first ten pages document supplies furnished to Revolutionary forces operating in the South Carolina backcountry during the later years of the war.
Page 2 records payment for 28 bushels of corn supplied to General Nathanael Greene’s army in 1781. Greene commanded the Continental Army in the southern theater after the fall of Charleston in 1780. His army moved repeatedly through the interior of South Carolina and North Carolina during 1781, relying heavily on provisions obtained from local farmers and supporters.
Corn was an especially important supply item because it could feed both soldiers and horses. Grain and corn meal were staple provisions during the southern campaigns.
Page 3 includes a certificate from the Commissary of Purchases verifying the delivery of 32 bushels of corn for the use of Greene’s army. Such certificates were commonly issued during the war because the army often lacked immediate funds to pay for provisions. Civilian suppliers were later compensated through the state treasury.
Pages 4–6 show the accounting process used to settle Wright’s claim through the treasury system. Wartime supply claims were frequently paid using certificates or “indents,” which functioned as a form of state-issued credit.
Militia Service and the Loss of a Mare
One of the accounts records reimbursement for:
“Provisions & forage for militia used in 1781 and 1782 and for a mare lost in militia service.”
This wording suggests that Wright himself was not serving as a soldier. Instead, it indicates that his mare had been used by militia forces and was lost while in service, entitling him to compensation.
Civilian horses were frequently used by mounted militia units or cavalry patrols during the war, especially in frontier districts where military resources were limited.
Provisioning Mounted Troops
One of the most revealing entries appears on Page 7:
“Provision & forage for 50 men & horses one night — a gill per man & horse as per Act of Assembly.”
The reference to both men and horses strongly suggests a mounted detachment rather than infantry. Infantry accounts normally refer only to men, while cavalry or mounted militia units required both food and forage.
The entry also references “a gill per man & horse.” A gill was a small liquid measure (about four ounces), usually referring to a ration of spirits issued according to wartime regulations. South Carolina law established the amount of food, drink, and forage civilians were required to supply when troops were quartered upon them.
This record preserves a vivid logistical moment during the war: a mounted detachment stopping overnight and being provisioned by a local civilian supporter.
Supplies for Hammond’s Light Horse
Receipts on Page 9 confirm deliveries to officers connected with Colonel Samuel Hammond’s Regiment of Light Horse, a Patriot cavalry unit active in the Ninety-Six District.
Hammond’s cavalry conducted scouting missions, escorted couriers, and harassed British outposts throughout the South Carolina backcountry during the later stages of the war.
These receipts confirm that Wright supplied items including:
• bags for military use
• corn meal for mounted troops
The presence of Hammond’s cavalry in these records strongly suggests that the mounted unit referenced earlier may have been part of Hammond’s Light Horse operating in the region.
Dig Deeper When Discrepancies Appear
A Second John Wright Appears
The next six pages of the file raised a new question. They document the service of John Wright as a Continental soldier.
At first I wondered whether this could still be my John Wright. But the details quickly suggested otherwise.
I returned to the DAR Genealogical Research System and searched again for John Wright with service in South Carolina.
There were indeed two different men:
• John Wright (DAR A130889) — Patriotic Service, furnished supplies
• John Wright (DAR A134706) — Private, 6th and 1st South Carolina Regiments
They had different wives, different children, and different ancestor numbers.
Yet both profiles listed the same source:
SC ARCH, ACCTS AUD #8802, Roll #163
Then I noticed something I had overlooked earlier. On the DAR profile pages for both men is the comment:
“There are at least two men of this name in the Accounts Audited.”
Because the records were filmed together under the same name, documents relating to two different men named John Wright were included in a single archival file.
A Record I Read Differently Now
When I first saw the phrase “furnished supplies,” it sounded minor compared to military service. But these records show how essential that support really was.
Greene’s army could not move through the South Carolina backcountry without local farmers providing corn, forage, livestock, and transportation. Cavalry patrols depended on civilians like John Wright for food and supplies as they carried messages, gathered intelligence, and kept pressure on British forces.
What first appeared to be a simple note—“furnished supplies”—turned out to be a window into the everyday logistics that made the Revolutionary War possible.
This record is a reminder to read sources carefully and to trust your intuition when something does not quite fit. Sometimes the real story is hidden in the details.
Write the Story
Once you have gathered the records and followed the clues, don’t stop there. Write the story.
In this case, what first appeared to be a simple note that my ancestor “furnished supplies” turned out to reveal much more: corn delivered to Greene’s army, provisions for mounted cavalry patrols, and even the discovery that two different men named John Wright had been mixed together in the same archival file.
Careful reading of the records—and a willingness to question what didn’t quite make sense—turned a brief line in a database into a much richer understanding of my ancestor’s role in the Revolutionary War.
Your ancestors have stories waiting in the records as well.
Write them down and share them.
You can read more stories about my Revolutionary War ancestors on my blog:
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy
https://libbyslegacies.blogspot.com/p/home.html
2025-12 Valley Forge Was the Myth – The Pension Act Was the Real Historic Event; Peter DeMoss
2026-3 A Revolutionary Cousin: Major Francis Marion McCorkle
2026-10 Patriotism Revisited: James Rigdon
2026-11 April 19, 1775: David Nye Answered the Lexington Alarm
2026-12 Amaziah Chappell: Addresses Along the Road to Independence
2026-13 More Than "Furnished Supplies": Reading John Wright’s Revolutionary War Record Again
Sources:
https://services.dar.org/Public/DAR_Research/search/?Tab_ID=1
No comments:
Post a Comment